About this Assignment
Symbolic logic and Venn diagrams are tools that can be used to remove the content of an argument and examine whether or not the argument itself makes sense. Using these tools, you will examine an exchange on social media using either Venn diagrams, symbolic logic, or both in your paper. Your paper should be 1500 words minimum.
Debates about policy, philosophy, theology, and ethics abound in social media between family, friends, and strangers and these arguments can get very heated. For this assignment, summarize arguments from one of the following exchanges of letters and analyze the argument using symbolic logic.
On the Ethics of Eating Meat – Nadia Khouri and Jamie Woodhouse
Is Circumcision Wrong? – Brian Earp and Josh Yuter
Fascism and the Ethics of Violence – Gretchen Mullen and Michael Isaacson
Be sure to cite which letters you are summarizing and deconstructing using symbolic logic (e.g. Letter #3 and #4).
Deconstruct both arguments into symbolic statements
Use Venn diagrams and/or truth tables to examine the soundness of the arguments.
Discuss the results of your examination and the limitations of your analysis
Demonstrate how the same arguments would work with a different subject
Formatting & Sources
Please write your paper in APA format. You may refer to the course material for supporting evidence, but you must also use at least 3 sources and cite them using APA format. Please include a mix of both primary and secondary sources, with at least one source from a scholarly peer-reviewed journal. If you use any Study.com lessons as sources, please also cite them in APA (including the lesson title and instructor’s name).
Primary sources are first-hand accounts such as interviews, advertisements, speeches, company documents, statements, and press releases published by the company in question.
Secondary sources come from peer-reviewed scholarly journals, such as Computing Edge. You may use sources like JSTOR, Google Scholar, and IEEE.org to find articles from these journals. Secondary sources may also come from reputable websites with .gov, .edu, or .org in the domain. (Wikipedia is not a reputable source, though the sources listed in Wikipedia articles may be acceptable.)
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more