Justice Worldview Paper Those who study judicial politics view the question of h


Justice Worldview PaperThose who study judicial politics view the question of how justices decide cases as the mostimportant topic. While they have explored some of the important influences on the justices’decisions, others remain entirely unconsidered. This paper asks students to reflect on theimpact of worldview on the rulings that justices make.This paper, then, is an opportunity for you to do original research. I recognize that most of youhave not written a research paper before. That’s fine. I’ve created a structure for you to follow.It’s a little bit like paint-by-number. Scholars would consider this qualitative and notquantitative research. Ideally, you would have a lot of data, but you don’t, so we’ll work withwhat you do have—Justice William O. Douglas’ book Of Men and Mountains.This should be a fun paper. It’s an experiment, and I hope that it works (but I’m not sure).The questionHow does worldview affect judicial decision making?What is a worldview?This can be a hard question to answer. It’s a system of beliefs—like ideology—but slightlydifferent. Psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists and other social scientists think moreabout it than political scientists. Let’s use this definition of worldview for this paper:Worldviews are individuals’ perceptions with their relationship with the world. This includesnature, institutions, other people and things (Sue 1978, 1971).Dimensions of worldviewThe concept of worldview is multidimensional. There are different aspects to it. AnthropologistClyde Kluckhorn (who studied the Navajo here in Arizona) gives five:Human NatureWhat is human nature?1. Bad: Humans are evil.2. Good and Bad: Humans are good and evil.3. Good: Humans are good.RelationshipsWhat is the modality of relationship?1. Lineal-hierarchical: Individuals have different amounts of power. The social roles andinequality persist over time.2. Collateral-Mutual: Society acts in the collective rather than individual interest.3. Individual: Individual goals are prioritized.NatureWhat is the relationship of people to nature?1. Harmony: People and nature harmoniously coexist.2. Subjugation and control: Humans control nature.3. Power of Nature: Nature controls humans.Time OrientationWhat is the temporal focus?1. The Past2. The Present3. The FutureActivity OrientationWhat is the focus of human activity?1. Being: Activities should be spontaneous and an expression of self.2. Being-in-becoming: Activities should develop the person.3. Doing: Activities should accomplish something that can be measured.Before you startGo through the readings from Of Men and Mountains. They can be those that I assigned or theentire book. Highlight any passage that you think gives insight into Justice William O. Douglas’worldview, especially those that you think address Kluckhorn’s five existential categories.OrganizationI’ve organized the paper into four sections.Section I: Introduction and set up.1. If you would like to include an abstract, that’s fine. It is not necessary.2. You need to explain the motivation for the research, which is:Those who study judicial politics have shown great interest in the decisions thatSupreme Court justices make. Nonetheless, little attention has been given to the impactof worldviews on the decisions that the justices make. This paper is a first effort toaddress this gap in the literature.3. Briefly describe the existing accounts of how justices decide cases—the attitudinal,strategic and legal models. Tell your readers that these models are important, butworldview might also influence the justices.4. Describe what worldview is and Kluckhorn’s existential categories.5. Tell your readers that you will attempt to show the impact of worldview by examiningJustice William O. Douglas’ perspectives in Of Men and Mountains and then looking forlinkages in some of his important opinions.Section II: What is William O. Douglas’ worldview?1. Categorize Justice William O. Douglas worldview using Kluckhorn’s schema.2. Do your best to support your choices with passages from the book.3. Briefly summarize what you think his worldview is.Section III: Impact on decision making.1. Read one of Douglas’ opinions below:a. Majority opinion in Griswold v. Connecticutb. Dissent in Sierra Club v. Mortonc. Concurring opinion in Roe v.Waded. Majority opinion in Terminiello v. City of Chicagoe. Or any other of his opinions that you like.2. What connections did you find between his worldview and the decision that you read?Section IV: Conclusion and references1. What conclusions have you drawn from your research?2. Do you discoveries merit future research?3. Be sure to list your references.Technical criteriaThis paper should be 5-10 pages in length with standard formatting. You should indent allparagraphs. An abstract is optional.RubricMany students want a rubric. I will grade this paper as follows:25% Quality of Writing and organization• This includes spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure.• Is the paper well organized?• Is the paper formatted correctly, i.e., 11-or-12-point font, double spaced, etc.• Are there transitions between the different sections of the paper?• Is the writing clear?• Did you organize your writing into paragraphs?• Did you indent your paragraphs?25% Strength of Argument• Do your arguments make sense?• Are your points compelling?• Did you give good support for your positions from the readings?• Did you find connections between worldview and the opinion that you selected?• Do your categorization choices make sense?40% Assignment• Did you follow the directions correctly?• Are all the required elements present?• Did you put thought and effort into your paper?10% Reference• Does your assignment have a reference page?• Did you pick a citation style and stick with it?• Are there in-text citations?• Are there enough in-text citations for the outside material that you included?ReferencesSome of these you will need for your paper.I recommend using these references for support. You are free to reference any source that youlike.Attitudinal ModelSegal, J. A., & Cover, A. D. (1989). Ideological values and the votes of US Supreme Courtjustices. American Political Science Review, 83(2), 557-565.Strategic ModelEpstein, L., & Knight, J. (1997). The choices justices make. Sage.Legal ModelBailey, M. A., & Maltzman, F. (2008). Does legal doctrine matter? Unpacking law andpolicy preferences on the US Supreme Court. American Political Science Review, 102(3),369-384.Kluckhorn’s existential categories of worldviewKluckhohn, C. (1956). Toward a comparison of value-emphases in different cultures. Thestate of the social sciences, 116-132.Kluckhohn, C. (2013). 2. Values and value-orientations in thetheory of action: An exploration in definition and classification.In Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388-433). HarvardUniversity Press.What is a Worldview?Sue, D. W. (1978). World views and counseling. The Personnel and GuidanceJournal, 56(8), 458-462.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more