Length: for Parts 1 and 2 together, NO LESS THAN EIGHT (8) double spaced pages, Times New Roman 12 pt font, not counting footnotes (if you choose footnotes) or in text citations or required References page, etc. You should be thorough. You may single-space Part 1 to bring it in line with case note format, which helps you be more thorough with Part 2.
Cases, statutes, etc. must be cited properly; save the References page for any outside articles, etc. that you might use.
Do outside legal research as you see fit, especially for Part 2. If you do, refrain from citing Dictionary.com or Merriam-Websters or Wikipedia some other sort of Answer.com site to avoid a loss in points.
Cite the source if you are summarizing something from that source or case; this paper must be original. Avoid cutting and pasting from sources; avoid quoting your instructor or course content; rather, fold those and relevant module information into your general knowledge.
Week 6 concepts and cases will guide your success. For Part 2, do not deal with any intellectual property or corporate liability issues.
Interweave law and fact for Part 2, and do not just tell us what you think the “law” is–spot the issues and analyze the possibilities.
Include superior structure, proper grammar and tone, style/sentence/paragraph structure, proper citatiosn. Use third person- Avoid “I” or “Me” unless asked expressly; use “we” or “us” if actively counseling or concluding.
No cover page necessary; for Part 2, do not mimic a fake memo heading (e.g. from, to, etc.).
Remember: In Part 1, do not regurgitate court language, and for Part 2, do not write a legal dictionary or your opinion.
Do a case notea more concise shorter version of what you did for your recent CA 2. and be detailed on the Analysis section of the courts holding, reasoning, whether it was groundbreaking, etc. Use whichever of the two formats you are comfortable with using (see case note format in instructions to previous assignment, or as prescribed and in the syllabus project description section) of the following case:
Pope v. Illinois.
(You find it, cite it properlyfamous case decided in the 1980’s. That’s the only hint you get.)
First–and this is important–look at the attached artwork.
Second–here’s the hypothetical–this is reality-based, but not a real problem. Do not invent material facts or “bring in” other facts from something “real” you perceive. Deal with the hypo as is.
You are a paralegal and law clerk at DC Comics’ Los Angeles office, working on clearances and other legal issues relating to media, such as film, TV, or computer games. One of the in-house attorneys, Liz Goldman at the New York HQ, calls you on company Zoom so she can talk digitally face-to-face (despite the three-hour time difference) and says:
The artwork (below) is a cover concept for a comic –basically a digital/e-book with accompanying music soundtrack and lines read by actors tracking the dialogue in the balloons in each panel (the reader need only tap a panel and the drawn/written dialogue and certain sound effects will be audible). This content will to be sold to Kindle and Samsung Galaxy users through Amazon, and iPad/iPhone users through Apple services.
All copyrighted artwork for the project was licensed in a deal last week to TRON Gaming (a fictional name for this assignment, pretend) which is 40% owned by DCs parent company, Time-Warner. The title of the comic and game will be: “The Dark Knight Gets his Cat” and the game, not the animated comic, will carry a mature warning label per the gaming industrys voluntary agreements from the 1990’s, and whatever labeling conventions exist today (research that), in downloadable or tangible retail format (i.e., from Game Stop, Best Buy, etc.) for PS4, XBox, and other platforms.
Liz looks worried on your desktop screen. She says, “The title troubles me because the whole thing is rife with that double entendre. The cover art (based on the artwork attached) might be okay, but we have kids trying to buy and download this comic and playing the game.
She shows you panels from the comic, and screenshots of the game. There is indeed nudity, but it is back and side; Bruce Wayne and Selina Kyle indeed have sex, and there are panels/segment of them in their costumes, but strategically ripped to expose body parts, and then sex as Batman and Catwoman. There are depictions of child abuse and undressed children, leering pedophile-type gangsters (the plot centers on a vicious ring of international child/sex-slave traffickers headed by the Penguin, and Catwoman decides to help the Batman).
She continues, Not to mention there’s graphic violence in both. There are bullet-ridden bodies, teeth and noses broken. Blood, blood, blood!”
“In other words,” you interrupt, “what real-life violence, wounds, and fears look like?”
“Yeah, but it all does come back to the sex and language. They use explicit profanity. Then, theres the double entendre issue with cat. I heard a rumor Walmart wont carry the game. Losing Wal-Mart would be a big problem. Still, it would be a boon to Game Stop and Best Buy, Target, etc.
You reply, sipping your triple espresso mocha latte, Im sure the bosses here and in Manhattan are worried nonetheless, right?
“Wrong!” She tells you the editors, producers, and artists are gung-ho and approved the launch. They paid big money to artists, game developers. and big name Hollywood actors to do voiceovers for the comic. Time-Warner, which through DC owns all the characters outright (unlike Marvel which has licensed them some out to Sony, otherwise they are owned by Disney for film). wants to make a big splash. Theyand PS, Xbox, Apple, Amazonanticipate huge. worldwide, not just U.S., sales. Recall the Japanese have been looking at explicit manga cartoons for years. Here in America, fans since the 1960’s, even folks marginally familiar with the characters, have eagerly wanted to see Batman and Catwoman hook up for real! There is a lot of pressure to launch, accordingly, and TRONs CEO has already been on CNBC (with DC executives), teasing and touting this as one of its new game-changing games for 2016.
Then, Liz asks you to prepare a brief, citing cases, statutes (all in proper citation form), articles, etc, for her, interweaving law and fact, and walking her through the potential legal pitfalls and potential issues and defenses (looking at this artwork and what shes told you in the worst possible light) associated with going ahead with this digital comic and game. She is interested in, for example, obscenity, indecency. and porn–both generally, in digital and print media, and specifically, with respect to children/minors. She’s heard of the old “Comics Code” but says that’s a minor issue. Shes heard of “pandering but is not sure its an issue. Shes also heard of a case called Pope v. Illinois, and wonders if it applies. Finally, shes worried about the FCC.
So, riddle us this Bat-fans–what do you tell her?
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more