Nonprofit Organizations: Comparison of Types

Week 1 – Assignment
Nonprofit Organizations: Comparison of Types
[WLO: 3] [CLOs: 1, 2]
The nonprofit sector is differentiated by many different types of organizations. In a 1050- to 1400-word (3-4 page) paper, select and compare two types of nonprofit organizations. In your comparison, first describe each type of organization in detail, and then compare both differences and similarities. Include in your discussion how each organization might be managed and led based on the type. Your paper should be supported by materials from the textbook and at least two additional academic sources. You may use any of the required or recommended articles for this course as additional academic sources.
Follow the instruction in the file. please read carefully and credibly supported by at least three to five brief cited and referenced current scholarly source no more than 7 years old. Use the recommended resource/ references provided by the professor. The post should focus on current realities. APA format, and references. https://excellentwriter.xyz/education-homework-help/nonprofit-organizations-comparison-of-types/ Please use the textbook source and resources. Whenever you quote, paraphrase, or summarize another person’s work, you need to cite the source within your paper. It is not enough to just list the source in the References or Works Cited at the end of your paper. Failing to properly cite someone else’s words and ideas at the point they show up in your paper is plagiarism
Please strictly use the recommended resources or else I will dispute the paper
· Required Resources
Text
Worth, M. J. (2021).  Nonprofit management: Principles and practices  (6th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
The full-text version of this ebook is available in your online classroom through the RedShelf, platform in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.
Articles
Daniel, B. V., West, J. K., Daniel, G. E., & Flowers, P. (2006). Grant writing as a funding source and collaborative endeavor. College Student Affairs Journal, 25(2), 199-208. (ProQuest Document ID: 1173322511).
Hofland, B. F. (2007). How American foundations plan and make decisions: A guide for the perplexed. Generations, 31(2), 54-59. (ProQuest Document ID: 1472519141).
IRS fact Sheets help nonprofits comply with laws. (2008, May). Nonprofit World, 26(3), 8. (ProQuest Document ID: 1489060001)
Knickman, J. R. (2007). Grantwatch perspective: Understanding the craft of philanthropy: Do we make something that should be simple too complex? Health Affairs, 26(6), 1776-1778. (ProQuest Document ID: 1384874811).
Porter, R. (2007). Why academics have a hard time writing good grant proposals. Journal of Research Administration, 38(2), 37-43. (ProQuest Document ID: 1388431311).
Stannard-Stockton, S. (2008, December 30). Sacrifice notion sabotages our non-profits. Financial Times, 6. (ProQuest Document ID: 1619612391).
Zweibel, N. R., & Golden, R. L. (2007). What foundations and nonprofits can do to foster productive relationships. Generations, 31(2), 41-46. (ProQuest Document ID: 1472519121).
Websites
BoardSource. (2003, March 1).  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Implications for Nonprofit Organizations (Links to an external site.) . GuideStar. Retrieved from  https://trust.guidestar.org/the-sarbanes-oxley-act-and-implications-for-nonprofit-organizations (Links to an external site.)
Fritz, J. (2017, April 03).  How Is a Nonprofit Different From a For-Profit Business? Getting Beyond the Myths (Links to an external site.) . the balance. Retrieved from https://www.thebalance.com/how-is-a-nonprofit-different-from-for-profit-business-2502472
GuideStar (Links to an external site.) . (n.d.). Retrieved from www.guidestar.org
IRS.Gov (n.d.).  Tax Information for Charities and Other Non-Profits (Links to an external site.) . Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits
McNamara, C. (n.d.).  Two Basic Types of Organizations: For-Profit (Business) and Nonprofit (Links to an external site.) . Free Management Library. Retrieved from http://managementhelp.org/org_thry/types.htm
Online Compendium of Federal and State Regulations for U.S. Nonprofit Organizations. (n.d.).  Tax-Exempt Organization Reference Chart (Links to an external site.) . Retrieved from http://www.muridae.com/nporegulation/documents/exempt_orgs.html
· Recommended Resources
Articles
· Brecher, C., & Wise, O. (2008). Looking a gift horse in the mouth: Challenges in managing philanthropic support for public services. Public Administration Review: Special Issue on The Winter Commission Report Revisited, S146-S161. (ProQuest Document ID: 1594819371).
· Brooks, J. (2008, November). 6 freakish facts about fundraising. Fundraising Success, 6(11), 17-19. (ProQuest Document ID: 1595350161).
· Burton, T. (2008, November). The most major of major gifts. Fundraising Success, 6(11), 28-31. (ProQuest Document ID: 1595350181).
· CEOs report alarming level of dissatisfaction with boards. (2008, November). Nonprofit World, 26(6), 27. (ProQuest Document ID: 1623859981).
· Child, C. D., & Grønbjerg, K. A. (2007). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Their characteristics and activities. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 259-281. (ProQuest Document ID: 1207770801).
· Lohmann, R. A. (2007). Charity, philanthropy, public service, or enterprise: What are the big questions of nonprofit management today? Public Administration Review, 67(3), 437-444. (ProQuest Document ID: 1287133791).
· Quinn, C. (2009, January 12). Fundraising goes creative: Nonprofits find new ways to earn means. Telegram & Gazette, B.1. (ProQuest Document ID: 1625654681).
· Research and Markets: Real-World Strategies That Work Effectively for Fundraising for Nonprofits. (9 January). Business Wire. (ProQuest Document ID: 1624255741).
· Robinson-Keeys, A. (2008, November). Recession-ready fundraising. Nonprofit World, 26(6), 6-7. (ProQuest Document ID: 1623859931).
· Saxton, G. D. (2005). The participatory revolution in nonprofit management. Public Manager, 34(1), 34-39. (ProQuest Document ID: 867286671).
· Tsacoumis, S. (2008, May). What corporate lawyers need to know about new IRS Form 990. Insights; The Corporate & Securities Law Advisor, 22(5), 11-16. (ProQuest Document ID: 1499655801).
· Werther, W. B., Jr, Berman, E., & Echols, K. (2005, September). The three roles of nonprofit management. Nonprofit World, 23(5), 22-23. (ProQuest Document ID: 903442901).
Multimedia
· Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. (2009, November 10).  Alice Krongold: Role of a Nonprofit Board (Links to an external site.)  [Video File]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4XOcJlheKw
· Carnegie Council for Ethics in  https://excellentwriter.xyz/education-homework-help/nonprofit-organizations-comparison-of-types/  International Affairs. (2009, November 12).  Karthik Krishnan: Dysfunctional Nonprofit Boards (Links to an external site.)  [Video File]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8e3O622yk0
· Columbia Budiness School. (2009, December 2).  Branding Nonprofit Organizations (Links to an external site.)  [Video File]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-zMF9ouwno
· GuideStar. (2011, December 22).  Form 990 Tutorial – Full (Links to an external site.)  [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgrxDudlB8M
· IndependentSector. (2009, November 9).  Diversity in Nonprofit Leadership (Links to an external site.)  [Video File]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSXkf5lZugw
· kuralay0505. (2009, May 8).  Steps for Nonprofit Accountability (Links to an external site.)  [Video File]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn__L_8anMc
· LaurenceScot. (2009, October 30).  Excerpt from 2009 990 Seminar (Links to an external site.)  [Video File]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMGgpRgrLX8
· Robertson, T. (2008, March 18).  Non Profit Branding (Links to an external site.)  [Video File]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYCFqfTxgvY
Websites
· Board Source (Links to an external site.) . (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.boardsource.org/
· Council on Accreditation (Links to an external site.) . (n.d.). Retrieved from http://coanet.org/
· Foundation Center (Links to an external site.) . (n.d.). Retrieved from https://candid.org/?fcref=lr
· Grants.Gov (Links to an external site.) . (n.d.). Retrieved from http://grants.gov/
· Philanthropy Journal (Links to an external site.) . (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.philanthropyjournal.org/
· The Chronicle of Philanthropy (Links to an external site.) . (n.d.) Retrieved from http://philanthropy.com/
HUM5220.W1A1.10.2018
Description:
Total Possible Score: 10.00
Describes Two Types of Nonprofit Organizations
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Clearly and thoroughly describes two types of nonprofit organizations.
Proficient – Fully describes two types of nonprofit organizations.
Basic – Describes two types of nonprofit organizations.
Below Expectations – Minimal description of one or two types of nonprofit organizations.
Non-Performance – Fails to describe one or two types of nonprofit organizations.
Compares the Differences and Similarities between the Organizations
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Includes a comprehensive comparison of the differences and similarities between the organizations.
Proficient – Fully compares the differences and similarities between the organizations.
Basic – Compares the differences and similarities between the organizations.
Below Expectations – Some comparison of the differences and similarities between the organizations is provided.
Non-Performance – Lacks a comparison of the differences and similarities between the organizations.
Evaluates How Each Type of Organization Should Be Mnaged and Led
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Extensively evaluates how each type of organization should be managed and led.
Proficient – Completely evaluates how each type of organization should be managed and led.
Basic – Evaluates how each type of organization should be managed and led.
Below Expectations – Some evaluation of how each type of organization should be managed and/or led.
Non-Performance – Fails to evaluate how each type of organization should be managed and/or led.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Evidence and Sources
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Demonstrates consistent use of reliable, appropriate sources and/or evidence to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing.
Proficient – Demonstrates mostly https://excellentwriter.xyz/education-homework-help/nonprofit-organizations-comparison-of-types/ consistent use of reliable sources that are appropriate to the discipline and genre of the writing. Sources offer some support to the ideas in the writing.
Basic – Demonstrates somewhat inconsistent use of sources that are mostly reliable to the discipline and genre of the writing. Sources offer little support to the ideas in the writing.
Below Expectations – Inconsistently utilizes sources and/or evidence that may be unrelated and offer little support to the ideas in the writing.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more